Jump to content

Talk:LightSail Energy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LightSail Energy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sources

[edit]

There is more sources to use here[1] and here[2].

  1. ^ Wesoff, Eric (2016-05-26). "LightSail Energy Storage and the Failure of the Founder Narrative | GTM Squared". www.greentechmedia.com. Retrieved 2020-02-25.
  2. ^ Spector, Julian (2017-12-19). "LightSail Energy Enters 'Hibernation' as Quest for Game-Changing Energy Storage Runs Out of Cash". www.greentechmedia.com. Retrieved 2020-02-25.

Yug (talk) 22:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
There is consensus not to merge. Polyamorph (talk) 10:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest tentatively that Danielle Fong be merged with this article. Apart from the fact that vandalism and original research have plagued that biography for a little while, I do not believe it meets WP:NBLP. No reliable, in-depth source giving information on Fong is cited; all of its sources are either puff pieces or articles mentioning Fong fairly incidentally. Pretty much all of the interesting, encyclopaedic information in that article could be integrated into this one. SaryaniPaschtorr (talk) 01:37, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Reviewing all the references currently on the article, all of them are about Lightsail except the 30-under-30 pieces which are indeed puff pieces. It seems quite fair to fuse the articles. Arjie (talk) 03:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Secarctangent (talk) 04:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As you admit, nothing has changed since the deletion discussion, and notability does not expire. While three years is a sufficient time-frame for consensus to change, to assess this a new AfD is required, not an under the RADAR merge proposal. Polyamorph (talk) 12:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Sources are largely in the context of her business rather than biographical. Reywas92Talk 13:41, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per past AfD consensus and sufficient sourcing. That the article is a target of vandalism is not a sufficient reason to delete, nor is the fact that Fong has not been the subject of recent news coverage. Notability is not temporary, and that she has not been in the spotlight recently doesn't change that she once was the subject of significant coverage. If the sources in the article are not satisfactory to you, a quick Google will reveal additional quality sources available, such as:
GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 13:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.