Talk:List of FC Seoul players

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 July 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inclusion criteria

Ideally the list should be converted to a table format at some point; I feel the inclusion criteria should be set at 50+ appearances. Giant Snowman 10:49, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I don't see why this list should be any different from any other club's list of players. – Pee Jay 20:33, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here is wikipedia. Why are aritcles regarding club's list of players same format? Who set a standard? Don't suppress the freedom of editing. Is Snowman owner of Wikipedia?

Actually, There was a independent article - List of FC Seoul foreign players. But after discussion, that article merged to List of FC Seoul players. Pleae compley with the result of discussion.Footwiks (talk) 13:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We have a standard because we are an encyclopedia. The MOS is set by WP:CONSENSUS. You are the one who is not abiding by the recent AFD discussion where it was determined the article was in need or an urgent, massive clean up. The only editor preventing that is YOU. Giant Snowman 14:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is standard? The stand that you set? Do I list another club player in this article? Giantman...Please take it easy.. Who don't care about that. Please concentrate on important thing. Also, Only you and only your friend is vandal this article. Befor you vandal, many years, anyone don't claim.Footwiks (talk) 11:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, standard set by the Wikipedia community, and in the style of many, many similar articles (including featured lists!) We are not vandalising - you are. This is going to WP:ANI. Giant Snowman 12:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:List of FC Seoul players. Giant Snowman 18:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question.

Firstly refer to List of Persepolis F.C. players, These article also have player category who participate in major tounaments and foreign players.Secondly refer toList of Chelsea F.C. players, List of Manchester United F.C. players These article also have captian category and award winners category. What is the difference from my editing version User:GiantSnowman and User:PeeJay2K3 insist that player article only have just listed players category who done some caps. What is the problem of my editing version? Is problem more detailed content about player than articles like List of Chelsea F.C. players, List of Manchester United F.C. players etc Please treat faily.

Don't be afraid of article standard improvement. My editing version have more useful informaions than GiantSnowman’s editing version (For example, users can find foreign players, captian players, world cup players in FC Seoul players. GiantSnowman is worried about that disunifying of standard unificaion regading player list article of among all of football club all over the world.) My editing version don’t disunify of articles standards unification. It is improvement of standard about player list article of football club Footwiks (talk) 01:47, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But the information you are trying to add is not encyclopedic! It's basically stuff that you (and only you!) find interesting/useful. Giant Snowman 14:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree. That is just jsut only your opinion. If the List of Chelsea F.C. players and List of Manchester United F.C. players have stuff like my editing of List of FC Seoul players. That articles are really useful and interesting informations for users. But Chelsea F.C. and Mancheste United had long history. So Editing is not impossilbe like my editing of Lst of FC Seoul players in detal. That's all.

I accept cumunity consensu. So I reduce category like List of Persepolis F.C. players 14:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Table format

I propose that we convert to a table format and introduce inclusion criteria of a minimum of 100 appearances, in line with this FL (and others) - thoughts welcome... Giant Snowman 15:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I wish to know what is wrong with this version[1] and why is the persent version the preferred version? The former gives a list of captains, representation in various important tournaments, list of foreign players. Very interesting. Perhaps there are wp:V issues. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 23:32, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a look at the AfD[2] that GiantSnowman has referred in discussions above. Footwiks says these are the sources. GiantSnowman comments that "I urge you to add the sources / improve the article. Even if this AFD closes as a 'keep' I will be deleting any unreferenced content in the article and editing to bring it in line with similar articles." Perhaps we need a few more editors who read Korean, and can write English. @Postdlf:? @Michig:? Do the two other admins involved in this Afd have any opinion. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 23:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of FC Seoul players. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927085245/http://www.kleague.com/kr/sub.asp?avan=1008120000 to http://www.kleague.com/kr/sub.asp?avan=1008120000

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]