Talk:List of chemical analysis methods

Duplication

Paramagnetic electron resonance seems identical with Electron spin resonance. Searching in WP for this latter you are directed to the former article, but an article entitled Electron-spin resonance also exist, which should be deleted. If nobody objects to this, whilst combining the two entries in our list here, I shall recommend the superfluous article for deletion. LouisBB (talk) 22:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: For Paramagnetic electron resonance read= Electron paramagnetic resonanceLouisBB (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected electron-spin resonance to electron paramagnetic resonance. --Itub (talk) 16:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit

Capitalisation of some of the titles now lead to two Wiki articles. I scrubbed Instrumental mass fractionation as I could not find such a title in the literature. I slightly altered the name of a missing title (Scanning Transmission X-ray Microscopy) and intend to write a few lines on it in due course to fill the gap, unless there is a speedier volonteer . A brief, but nicely presented description is given in an Internet article by the European Synchotron Radiation Facility [1]LouisBB (talk) 22:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit 2.

Added:
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Computed tomography, also called Synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy.
Titlechange of article required
From Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy to Scanning X-ray Microscope. This only differs from the existing X-ray microscope through its scanning element. The transmission word has been dropped because only the transmission type seems to exist, and the cited reference from ESRF (European Synchotron Research Facility) uses this shortened term for the scanning transmission X-ray microscope. The title for Microscope instead of Microscopy is to accord with the existing Wikipedia article on the Scanning Electron Microscope.

I wish to indicate the state of the reference by the inclusion of the abbreviation "(stub)" if appropriate for potential editors, unless anybody objects.
LouisBB (talk) 12:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LouisBB (talk) 12:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]