Jump to content

Talk:List of film roles for which Bill Murray was considered

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability

[edit]

Please read WP:LISTN before proposing or nominating this article for deletion. This list is notable in multiple reliable sources including HuffPost, Vulture.com, Mental Floss and Business Insider. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 August 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to List of film roles for which Bill Murray was considered, which seems to have the most support (see WP:NOGOODOPTIONS). There's consensus that the current title is problematic; if anyone can think of an even better title, feel free to start another RM. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]



List of films Bill Murray was considered to appear in → ? – Ambiguous title. The intended meaning here was "films whose producers attempted to contact Bill Murray to cast him in a role, but he missed out on for one reason or another" — but as worded, the title could just as easily mean "films that Bill Murray has actually been credited with appearing in even if his appearance was questionable or dubious". So a clearer, more unambiguous name is needed. Bearcat (talk) 01:36, 17 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Title seems fine how? Down with blatant ambiguity, are ya? Bearcat (talk) 02:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Fine" covers it, the title reflects the page content. Although Red Slash's and Necrothesp's collab title may be ultra-fine (List of film roles for which Bill Murray was considered). Randy Kryn (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.