Talk:List of intelligent dance music artists

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Untitled

Anyone else feel that Daft Punk doesn't belong on the list? I don't have a recollection of every song in their discography, but I can't think of one that falls in the category of IDM. --16bitsocialites 10:56, 05 Feb 2008

I agree. I'd say Daft Punk is fairly typical acid/techno without the glitchy/weird element that characterises IDM. Also: Bjork? Jesus. 217.42.87.28 (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We need WAY more artists. I figured we'd need a list like this to expand interest in the genre, or something like that. --Felixed 19:45, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ulrich Schnauss has no business on this list. The wiki page on him doesn't describe him as IDM and I don't think anybody who's ever listened to him would either. (that's not to say he's not a good artist, just not IDM) dzhastin (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Mikejcosta (talk) 15:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Ellen Alien, Modeselektor, Orb, Solvent, Telefon Tel Aviv, Lemon Jelly, Mouse on Mars, Banco De Gaia, might not belong on this list. While all excellent artists, including them would be watering down the very specific genre of IDM.[reply]

I disagree, I think at least Mouse On Mars do belong to this list, and a lot of artists are missing. IDM does not really meet any standard, It's more a question of approach than "there must be this glitch or this break in it". It can be weird, naive, deep, minimal, emotional, brutal, with or without broken beat. I think what makes it "IDM" is that it is an evocative, quite complex, aesthetic and both counterintuitive music. 217.109.211.214 (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It just makes me laugh. Some one (always the same guy?) keeps removing Leftfield from this list. Same as 3 years ago. -andy 92.229.184.188 (talk) 17:36, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetizing Proper Names: First or Last name?

Looking at the list, it appears we need to make up our minds as to how solo artists using their proper names are alphabetized. Personally, I've always gone by the first name since band names and monikers would work the same way. I may clean this up in the near future if no one objects. StuOnThis (talk) 18:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one objected in the last several months, I went ahead and re-alphabetized the list using the first names of proper name entries as most other musical artist lists. StuOnThis (talk) 19:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]