Talk:List of off-season Pacific hurricanes

List of off-season Pacific hurricanes is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 7, 2013	Featured list candidate	Not promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 29, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that at least 17 tropical cyclones in the East Pacific have existed during the off-season?

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific B‑class Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pre-1949 storms

I don't think the storms outside of the best track should be included, as they aren't done so in the Atlantic either. The time frame before the best track is simply unreliable, with no satellites and so few ships in the region. Maybe have a brief mention of them somewhere, but I don't think it should be in the main list. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:43, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I guess I won't --12george1 (talk) 23:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. First, the off-season (forming) storms are already listed at List of Pacific hurricanes, in the off-season section and occasionally elsewhere. Second, they are mentioned in the seasonal articles. This, if we go by inclusion in best track (presumably HURDAT), Carmen would have to be excluded as it is not in HURDAT. It is included in the CPHC archive. If we defer to the CPHC as it is CPac official, (which leads to the inclusion of Carmen) then should take the same position for the other CPac systems, which leads to including the pre-1949 CPac off-seasoners. As it seems arbitrary to include only pre-1949 CPac off-seasoners, we should therefore include pre-1949 EPac off-seasoners as well. I don't find Hurricanehink's argument about unreliability before the best track convincing, on the grounds that the best track before the satellite era is unreliable itself. For example, one storm is missing from 1949, and I'm sure that no one seriously believes that every system early on was counted. For these reasons, I disagree and think pre-1949 off-seasoners should be included. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 04:16, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, on a similar note, should we include pre-1851 storms in the Atlantic? I mainly just want consistency. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 02:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

East Pacific

The article would benefit from giving a geographic definition for East Pacific. Does it relate to the northern hemisphere only, or to both hemispheres? Schwede 66 17:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"East Pacific" refers to the area of the Pacific east of 140°W near Mexico. HurricaneFan 25 23:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

Style question

So this was generating some controversy earlier, but the definition of EPAC technically is from North America to the dateline, yet we have records for "eastern pacific proper", so there's a need to mention both the NHC and CPHC AOR. I added a note as a short-term fix, but the wording in the note, plus the lead is nowhere near sufficient. Any input? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 01:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 May 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Very late WP:SNOW. Clearly never going to happen. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

List of off-season Pacific hurricanes → List of off-season Pacific Tropical Cyclones – "Hurricane" is a term that does not include tropical storms and tropical depressions, so "tropical cyclones" will more accurately represent the off-season storms. Gummycow ^moo _milk 17:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would Oppose this unless we are going to include tropical cyclones in the South Pacific within this list that occur outside of the normal season. Jason Rees (talk) 17:51, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as per Jason Rees reson HurricaneEdgar 17:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because "hurricanes" is the common name for tropical cyclones in the eastern Pacific. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 21:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. ~~ 🌀𝚂𝙲𝚂 𝙲𝙾𝚁𝙾𝙽𝙰🌀 23:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jason Rees et al. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.