Jump to content

Talk:Long-beaked echidna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 September 2019 and 7 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hurdygurdyhero.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

Can anyone add a picture? Thanks.--68.90.62.100 21:23, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A thirty meter echidna...

[edit]

In regards to the zaglossus hacketti: "Remarks: This species is known only from a few bones. At 30 metres long, it was huge for an echidna and for monotremes in general."

I think that pretty much speaks for itself. Anyone know how large those were actually supposed to be? I've read "sheep-sized" somewhere, but I'm not sure. --Matt S. 17:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One meter is correct, 30 is not. It was some vandalism that didn' get revert awhile back. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Long-beaked echidna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]