Talk:Long (Chinese surname)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Long (surname) was copied or moved into Long (surname 龍) with this edit on 08:17, 2 August 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
On 13 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Long (surname 龍) to Long (Chinese surname). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Gŭ (surname 古) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 13 August 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Aprilajune (talk) 03:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
– We don't need to use Chinese disambiguators unless necessary. The text says "Another name transcribed as Long is 隆, which is very rare in contemporary China." Yinweiaiqing (talk) 02:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Although Long (English surname) would probably be more appropriate, as it's obviously an English-language name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:59, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support the Western one has 590 views but the Chinese one has 485[[1]] which clearly isn't enough for a PDAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.