Talk:Loveeeeeee Song
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Loveeeeeee Song article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Loveeeeeee Song appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 December 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved) Mike Cline (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Loveeeeeee Song → Love Song (Rihanna song) – I am not sure if "Loveeeeeee Song" counts like a stylization of the actual title that I am proposing. I would be grateful to everyone who expresses his/her's opinion whether the article should or not be move. Thanks. — Tomíca(T2ME) 19:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- Certainly the current title is ridiculous in terms of navigation. I suppose, however, a user could just type "Love" and continue typing Es until he or she finds this page. --BDD (talk) 20:48, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- I think it's fine. Christina's "Dirrty" has two r's in it lol. No different to really long song tiles like Last Friday Night (T.G.I.F.), [[Stop Crying Your Heart Out]. You only have to type "lovee" and it appears in the search bar automatically. Don't think it's an issue. AARON• TALK 21:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- Why don't you just create Love Song (Rihanna song) as a redirect to the page Loveeeeeee Song. Till 04:12, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. The song is called "Loveeeeeee Song" (not "Love Song") and should be named as such. 82.132.139.250 (talk) 17:12, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Reviews
[edit]- http://www.factmag.com/2012/11/23/rihanna-unapologetic/
- http://www.spin.com/reviews/rihanna-unapologetic-def-jam
- http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/review/rihanna-unapologetic/2929
- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/smokey-fontaine/rihanna-unapologetic_b_2155109.html
- http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/21/arts/music/rihannas-album-unapologetic-makes-most-of-her-talent.html?_r=0
- http://www.billboard.com/new-releases/rihanna-unapologetic-track-by-track-review-1008018012.story#/new-releases/rihanna-unapologetic-track-by-track-review-1008018012.story
- http://www.esquire.com/blogs/culture/rihanna-unapologetic-album-review-14761669
- http://hellobeautiful.com/2583503/rihanna-unapologetic-album-review-sultry-billboard-magazine-cover/
- http://consequenceofsound.net/2012/11/album-review-rihanna-unapologetic/
- http://idolator.com/7285332/rihannas-unapologetic-album-review
- http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/albumreviews/a439292/rihanna-unapologetic-album-review.html
- http://popcrush.com/rihanna-unapologetic-album-review/
- http://thelavalizard.com/2012/11/album-review-rihanna-unapologetic/
- http://www.vibe.com/article/unapologetic-review-rihanna-sorry-shes-not-sorry
- http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=10848799
DYK
[edit]single?
[edit]How does ONE UK radio station playlisting a song make it a single? Songs do not chart in the uk based on airplay and one will find that particularly Radio 1xtra will playlist any song from an album should it gain digital momentum. This song should NOT be called a single without other sources clarifying that its a single. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.227.21.68 (talk) 03:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)