Jump to content

Talk:Lunca de Jos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Szekely land political map" in innapropriate place

[edit]

This edit is the problem, it is promoting Hungarian irredentism. [1]

Arguments:

  • "Szekely land" doesn`t exist anymore and it is not a geographical region (like Banat, Transylvania and others) as User:Rokarudi uses it in the lead sometimes. It was just a political entity that existed some time and now it doesn`t. It can be taken only as a cultural region at most.
  • "Szekely land" is not a "reality" [2]. The UDMR political party lobbies to become a reality - the concept of territorial entity is illegal according to the constitution of Romania and the European Union. See this [3] for further explanation.
  • "Szekely land" is listed as one of the irredentism movements in Europe. Please see this [4] under Europe/Hungarian. Note: "Szekely land" is a Hungarian claimed region in Transylvania, Romania.
  • Also WP:PROMOTION (that deals with nationalistic promotions)
  • And WP:ENC.

Using in the lead "Szekely land" also throws a nationalistic shadow having in mind it isn`t a geographical region nor political entity. See also: Irredentism and List of irredentist claims or disputes for in clarities about this concept.

User:Rokarudi promote "Szekely land" with mentioning it in inappropriate places (like in the lead or various maps). This kind of Hungarian irredentism is so obvious since if it would really insist so much on showing this village on some map, there is a perfectly good map of Harghita county or maps of Transylvania. Also, it may be considered as a redundant information since this village is already represented on the map of Romania in the infobox.iadrian (talk) 19:58, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lunca de Jos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]