Talk:Lungi

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bangladesh Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Mundu

Some one created a seperate article for Mundu. I feel it should be merged into Lungi and redirected. - Ganeshk ^{«talk»|«contribs»} 15:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove merge request. Added it to Dhoti page. - Ganeshk (talk) 14:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Old merger proposal

CLOSED

Reject merging of article(s) as per no consensus to merge. Non-Administrative closure-- GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 20:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I propose that Longyi be merged into Lungi. I think that the content in the Longyi article can easily be explained in the context of Lungi, and the Lungi article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Longyi will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. 117.195.195.124 (talk) 07:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Longyi should be kept separate from Lungi for people who are specifically looking at Burmese history and dress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.84.154.8 (talk) 01:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also disagree, and concur with the comment above - people looking for information about Burmese longyis do not want to be overwhelmed with information about India.119.15.73.5 (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge on the grounds that there are culturally important differences between India and South Asia that warrant separate coverage. Klbrain (talk) 10:48, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Formal request has been received to merge: Longyi into Lungi; dated: May 24, 2020. Proposer's Rationale: They are about Same cloth with Same Origin and Same Name only the later one filled with nationalistic non important History and Description, can easly intigrated in a one NonPOV neutral article. —

Longyi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lungi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Discuss below. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 20:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: Defiantly Wikipedia:Content forking, Wikipedia:Duplicate article and Wikipedia:POV applicable here! Except some locally produced history of "introducing the garment in burma" both article describe the same thing!!-89.0.170.238 (talk) 08:04, 11 July 2020 (UTC) — 89.0.170.238 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

I agree. It talks about the same thing. There does not need to be another article just for another country.Bengalipotatoeater (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Longyi and Lungyi are often equated. However actually, Burmese Longyi has own number of history in ancient Burmese tradition and culture. So i oppose. Btw above 'agree votes' are come from a few edited IP and newly created account (may be a sock of IP). VocalIndia (talk) 18:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Although related, the Longyi comes from South East Asia, and the Lungi of the Indian subcontinent. BTW, why does Mundu have its own separate article? Mundu of India should be merged with Lungi before Longyi of South East Asia can be dealt with. Nolicmahr (talk) 16:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From what I see, their is a stronger case for a merging Lungi with the Indian Mundu, than with the Southeast Asian Longyi. Nolicmahr (talk) 16:12, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose and agree per User:Nolicmahr.

Longyi is regarded as the national costume of Burma, so it should stand alone as one main article. Zin Win Hlaing (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.