Jump to content

Talk:M-122 (Michigan highway)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: — PCB 14:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Perhaps a reference for that people had to take the ferry in the route description?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Putting article on hold for minor issue.
    I added a citation for that sentence, which is not any of the following: "direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, [or] contentious material relating to living persons. Those are the only items required to have citations under the GA criteria. Also note, I reverted your addition of periods to the lead sentence of the article; the Chicago Manual of Style no longer requires them and our MoS is following suit. Imzadi 1979  18:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]