Talk:M-122 (Michigan highway)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: — PCB 14:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Perhaps a reference for that people had to take the ferry in the route description?
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Putting article on hold for minor issue.
- I added a citation for that sentence, which is not any of the following: "direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, [or] contentious material relating to living persons. Those are the only items required to have citations under the GA criteria. Also note, I reverted your addition of periods to the lead sentence of the article; the Chicago Manual of Style no longer requires them and our MoS is following suit. Imzadi 1979 → 18:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Putting article on hold for minor issue.
- Pass/Fail: