Talk:MG 08

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MG 08 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War I / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Untitled

How was the water circulated in and out of the barrel sleave? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.113.47.88 (talk) 19:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy between English and German entry for Maschinengewehr08

I just read through the german entry for Maschinengewehr 08, which states that Germany was in possesion of 4919 MG08s at the start of WWI, while the english entry lists a numer of "aprox. 12000" MG08s available to german battle units at the start of WWI in August 1918. I have no means of checking this numer, so I leave this here as a comment for someone who has. 84.148.119.73 20:15, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poor use of English words and extremely long and awkward sentence structures in the last paragraph.

This is really pulling down the whole story to a low level. The subject is too serious to be messed with by amateur historians. Now last paragraph has been corrected 71.84.8.103 (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have an M.G.08. Serial#49478 D.W.M.Berlin 1918.It has 2 wooden handles that unscrew at top.One looked to be a wire brush and the other looks like a small soft brissle brush.Some of the other numbers and letters on the right side are as follows:9478,DWM with 2 small engravers mark.It also has a slide button on a scale,that is numbered from 0 up to 70.It looks like it could be fired singluary or full.It also has 2 safety's.Cheers ! congotom@zoominternet.net —Preceding unsigned comment added by Congotom (talk • contribs) 03:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Size matter

Shouldn't 7.92 mm (0.31 in) be changed? Wasn't the actual bore diameter was .323, to fire the standard military caliber slug? Trekphiler (talk) 12:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not going to add a definitive answer, since it's not my area, but this is precisely why we don't "translate" calibers in aircraft articles! :) --Rlandmann (talk) 11:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SI units?

Should the amount of cooling water be in liters than in gallons? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.190.16 (talk) 11:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish MG08's

These were all manufactured or re-manufactured to fire the rimmed 7.62x53R round thats similar to the Russian 7,62x54R, with some variation in bullet and case dimensions something like in .223 Remington vs 5.56x45mm NATO, sometimes being unsafe or inaccurate if "cross fired" from a weapon intended for the another. Maybe this should be mentioned in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.154.204.152 (talk) 16:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Used in Netherland since 1925 [1] --David-bel (talk) 20:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability. The text you are adding may be completely factual but it still must be verifiable, and free web pages are not suitable sources. ROG5728 (talk) 21:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:German Infantry 1916.JPG Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:German Infantry 1916.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use by Austro-Hungarian units

Is there any proof at all that confirms use of this machinegun by Austria-Hungary? I haven't found a single picture or other source that confirms this claim. M11rtinb (talk) 17:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]