Talk:Management features new to Windows Vista
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This subarticle is kept separate from the main article, Windows Vista, due to size or style considerations. |
Fair use rationale for Image:Windows Vista Setup.png
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Windows Vista Setup.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Windows Vista Task Scheduler.png
[edit]The image Image:Windows Vista Task Scheduler.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
I've added a {{povcheck}} tag on this article (which will need to be renamed as this article can be at best transitory or temporary with this title - and I can see this being prodded or going to WP:AFD by someone viewing the title as promotional in nature) as this appears to read like a news release or documentation that would be packed in the box containing an on-disk version of the Microsoft Vista package. But then again, a person within the computer science field might view this differently. Perhaps a merge with Microsoft Vista would be the most appropriate move here. B.Wind (talk) 17:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- No it wouldn't. Have you looked at the size of either this article or Windows Vista? (not "Microsoft Vista" -- if you're going to criticise an article, at least get the name right, hey?) Warren -talk- 22:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- That's why I ask here - I know WP:CIVIL better than I know computing - so should you, evident by the post above. (by the way, Microsoft's first announcements about Vista actually distanced it from Windows, hence my mistake) Now, what is to be done about the promotional tone or the name of the article? B.Wind (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- I replaced the promotional (and transitional) "new to" in the title to the more neutral "originating in", but more is needed in the text, though. B.Wind (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- That's why I ask here - I know WP:CIVIL better than I know computing - so should you, evident by the post above. (by the way, Microsoft's first announcements about Vista actually distanced it from Windows, hence my mistake) Now, what is to be done about the promotional tone or the name of the article? B.Wind (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Management features new to Windows Vista. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151105224141/http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/8/f/98f3fe47-dfc3-4e74-92a3-088782200fe7/TWAR05002_WinHEC05.ppt to http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/8/f/98f3fe47-dfc3-4e74-92a3-088782200fe7/TWAR05002_WinHEC05.ppt
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070213093537/http://www.windowsvistauserguide.com/disk_defragmenter.htm to http://www.windowsvistauserguide.com/disk_defragmenter.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007154822/http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/9c7ecc7d-8784-4b8d-ba1f-ba1882ba83741033.mspx to http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/9c7ecc7d-8784-4b8d-ba1f-ba1882ba83741033.mspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080405183000/http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/fb3681b2-da39-4944-93ad-dd3b6e8ca4dc1033.mspx?mfr=true to http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/fb3681b2-da39-4944-93ad-dd3b6e8ca4dc1033.mspx?mfr=true
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070423121442/http://computerbits.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/new-command-line-tools-in-vista-beta-2/ to http://computerbits.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/new-command-line-tools-in-vista-beta-2/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Microsoft articles
- Low-importance Microsoft articles
- WikiProject Microsoft articles
- C-Class Microsoft Windows articles
- Mid-importance Microsoft Windows articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- WikiProject Microsoft Windows articles
- C-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Low-importance
- All Software articles