Talk:Manu v Steelink Contracting Services Ltd
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because I find it difficult to argue that an article of 300 words is "too short". I have done numerous other legal articles on Wikipedia that are shorter, and I have not been challenged by an editor. If the editor would first care to read the full transcript of the judgment, perhaps they would then be in a better position to argue that the article is not enough.--Kiwisheriff (talk) 04:58, 15 April 2013 (UTC)