Jump to content

Talk:Margareth Rago

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 19:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Margareth Rago seeks to establish a methodology for what she calls "feminist science"? Source: Rago, Margareth (1998). "Epistemologia Feminista, Gênero e História". In Pedro, Joana; Grossi, Miria (eds.). Masculino, Feminino, Plural (in Portuguese). Florianópolis: Editora Mulheres. p. 3. ISBN 9788586501050. OCLC 40480938.

Created by Grnrchst (talk). Self-nominated at 19:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Margareth Rago; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: The article is new enough, long enough and cited. It doesn't appear like there's any copyvio issues and the hook is cited (AFG on offline source). Technically the source is cited to the author's own work but its fine for this type of hook imo. If someone else objects to the hook, we can try to find another one. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Early life?

[edit]

This article, an ostensible biography, begins with its subject's university graduation. Like too many others on Wikipedia, it contains nothing about its subject's parents, siblings, early schooling, formative influences, and the like. Surely this information is out there. Omitting it simply makes the article look like nobody could be bothered to include this information. JingleJim (talk) 02:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]