Talk:Marvel Swimsuit Special
Appearance
![]() | Marvel Swimsuit Special has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 3, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Marvel Swimsuit Special appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Marvel Swimsuit Special/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 03:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Starting review Kingsif (talk) 03:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Kingsif: Hi, just wanted to inquire about the status of this review. Do you know when you'll be able to continue? Morgan695 (talk) 16:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Morgan695: When I remember I didn't finish it - I had it on a watch so it wouldn't have been much longer, but thanks for the ping! Pasted review below, sorry for the wait! Kingsif (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Kingsif: Hi, edits have been made. Morgan695 (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Morgan695: When I remember I didn't finish it - I had it on a watch so it wouldn't have been much longer, but thanks for the ping! Pasted review below, sorry for the wait! Kingsif (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Style
[edit]- Lead could be a little longer, based on the overall length of the article
- Development section written well - fluid and nice
- Need a ref for "parody advertisements and fake interviews" sentence - I checked sources so I imagine it's in one of the nearby refs, but for ease, this warrants one at the end.
- Not sure the Marvel Swimsuit Special #1 description should be presented as an 'e.g.' Perhaps replace as "One was the Marvel Swimsuit Special #1, which is set..." - or similar.
- Coming off this, see coverage comment
- Reception section good
- Revivals section good
- Needs attention one little thing
Coverage
[edit]- Lead gives good coverage
- Good coverage of development
- May need some more coverage in Content, specifically having descriptions of the other comics as well as Marvel Swimsuit Special #1.
- Good coverage of reception; perhaps a bit light on critics (only 4, though the series was prolific) but seems representative enough
- Seems to use all available info about revivals
- Needs attention one little thing
Illustration
[edit]- Good use of table
- Good idea to illustrate gender equality; good selection of appropriate images for it
- Pass
Verifiability
[edit]- Sources look good
- Slight concern over Comicbook.com, but it seems reliable for what it is being used to source
- Pass
Stability
[edit]- History squeaky clean
- Pass
Neutrality
[edit]- Looks clear
- Pass
Copyright
[edit]- Check looks clean
- All images fair use, with solid reasoning for each
- Pass
Overall
[edit]on hold - see notes. Very close, just a few little things. Kingsif (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Nice work! Kingsif (talk) 21:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)