Talk:Mateiu Caragiale/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will begin reviewing this page shortly. Ricardiana (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Yes, the article is well-written - no errors, clear, sophisticated use of English.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Impressive number of citations to reliable sources.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Covers Caragiale very thoroughly.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Akcnowledges various points of view when necessary; employs neutral tone.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- Some disputes in the past, but not since 2006, it looks like.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images seem appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- PASS
- Pass/Fail: