Talk:Materva

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 December 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Trying to scrape together some sources

It is frustratingly very easy to find literature and other cultural resources (such as obituaries of Cuban-Americans) that use "they drink Materva" as a signifier of Cuban culture/participation in Cuban culture. I could easily cite all those, but it feels a little WP:NOR. In trying to find some better alternatives, here is a list - not sure how best to incorporate them at the moment but noting them here:

Rabade Roque, Raquel. The Cuban Kitchen. p. 6. - cookbook, listing Materva as part of the standard "Cuban pantry" that anyone doing Cuban cooking should have on hand.
Levine, Robert. Cuban Miami. p. 77. - describes Materva as a "famous Cuban brand", but notes it is not available on the island without explanation. (Castro shut down the factories after the revolution, according to another source I saw; I'll see if I can find that again.)
Cubas, Mario Anthony. Performing Cubanidad. - apparently discusses importance of Materva in "performing cubanidad", but I can't seem to find a complete copy anywhere. Am emailing the author.

[Update: I've added the first two to to the article; still waiting for a copy of the third. -LuisVilla (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)][reply]

You need extensive discussion of the subject, not mentions of it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revolutionaries?

There is a paragraph that uses the term "revolutionaries" in relation to the word "strikes". First, the source doesn't support that the Civic Resistance Movement, who organized the strikes, were revolutionaries. Second, there were revolutionaries on the ant-Communist side, specifically the Student Revolutionary Directorate, so we don't have any idea which side organized these strikes by using that term. Finally, it's against WP:NPOV and it pushes an anti-communist PoV, which isn't at all acceptable. I propose the following wording:

During the Cuban Revolution, the Materva bottling plant was targeted by the Civic Resistance Movement for strikes, along with the Coca-Cola and Pepsi bottling plants.

Unfortunately, there is no article for Civic Resistance Movement and linking to Manuel Ray Rivero doesn't make sense here. It also isn't the CIA-supported Cuban Revolutionary Council or Cuban Democratic Revolutionary Front, with which the term may be confused. If there are no objections, I will add the wording within a few days. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:51, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use candidate from Commons: File:Materva.jpg

The file File:Materva.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:Materva.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:54, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Materva. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140113000220/http://www.elnuevoherald.com/2011/03/19/906327/fallece-cubano-que-popularizo.html to http://www.elnuevoherald.com/2011/03/19/906327/fallece-cubano-que-popularizo.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]