Talk:Media Take Out

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Media Take Out article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

African diaspora Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Criticism section

I removed the completely unsourced criticism section here. Regardless of the COI behind the complaints, negative allegations like that shouldn't be there unsourced for that many months. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MTO Starting rumors and/or lies!!

shouldn't there be a section on how media take out makes up stories, lies, and rumors!!! or claiming there the first to report a story when there really not.. and stealing pictures from other sites and putting their logo on it!!! 67.181.180.193 (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead source and lack of citations

First, this looks like it was written by Media Take Out's PR team. Second, it's asserted that MTO has been quoted by (long list of media and radio personalities] from a variety of its 'exclusives'.

None of those are sourced verifiably. They were all listed under one citation, and that source is now a dead link. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to make any of the particular edits required to reflect this, nor to flag it.

Any chance someone could help out with that?

--PJ 96.249.4.46 (talk) 23:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Media Take Out. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080417031202/http://www.eurweb.com/story/eur32903.cfm to http://www.eurweb.com/story/eur32903.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]