Talk:Medical library

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Resource Exchange

If you have access to this resource, or if you need to verify a citation from this reference, check out WikiProject Resource Exchange.Resource ExchangeWikipedia:WikiProject Resource ExchangeTemplate:WikiProject Resource ExchangeResource Exchange articles

Libraries Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

glad you like it, but who are you? Do you mean approval by wikiproject medicine, ,or the MLA, or a vote of medical librarians on WP, or what?DGG 07:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just means it's part of the medical project. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 07:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd add an explanation for the importance rating: No matter how important these repositories of knowledge are, or how substantial the article becomes, I doubt that this article will be a popular topic for someone looking to learn about medicine. A similar 'library' project would doubtless rate it higher. WhatamIdoing 18:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding a list of the world's medical libraries to help improve this article, in keeping with the message posted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.133.1 (talk) 23:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently done a bit of expanding on the Special library article and added a sub section which could be expanded to discuss medical libraries in general. If that subsection were to be expanded, it could link to this article, which could be re-named "American Medical Libraries" to reflect it's geographical bias. Just a thought. Either way, if someone could help expanding the "Medical Libraries" sub section under Special library it would be much appreciated. Murasaki.suki (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murasaki.suki (talk • contribs)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Medical library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]