Talk:Medical photography

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Medical photography article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 11 February 2012 by reviewer Ktr101 (talk · contribs).

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medical Photography

This article references each fact appropriately and uses mostly reliable sources. It has an detailed resource list, all ranging from encyclopedias, atlases, and medical journals. There are a few resources that are just website URLs. This just not give the impression of reliable and justifiable sources. For the topic of medical photography, this article does a good job of introducing the subject, the history of the topic, and how to become one. One section that that distracted the readers was the consent issues. I feel if there was a section titled issues consent issues could be included, but because this is by itself with no earlier introduction or tie to the rest of the sections it is not relevant to the article topic. This article did not seem to be biased and remained neutral throughout the entire article. The resources are also neutral. Suggestions for this article would be fixing the website resources and developing more on the issues during the development of medical photography. I would also add a section of medical photography today. That way readers know how medical photography came to be and how it has developed today. Duffmack (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC) Mackenzie Duff[reply]