Jump to content

Talk:Melanie Mitchell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cleanup

[edit]

There's a bit of puffery in the article, but let's not be too hasty with the deletion, shall we? I just tagged the statements for sourcing this week, and WP:There is no deadline. If I thought the statements were without hope of a reasonable solution, I would have left them deleted, rather than reverting and tagging them. Jclemens (talk) 06:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is a link to her google scholar articles enough to substanciate the fact that she's among the most cited authors? 3000+ citations for a book is impressive...Zorbid (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There a lot of articles on scientists who are clearly good scientists, but really shouldn't have articles on them. I think it's reaching the point of silliness. Wikipedia is not supposed to be a place to post CV's. She is clearly an excellent scientist, but wikipedia simply shouldn't have articles on every highly intelligent person on the planet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.4.50.98 (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Melanie Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]