Jump to content

Talk:Meskel Square

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Meskel Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested merge

[edit]

There's enough room in the present article to include the content from Status of Meskel Square and having it all in place is a benefit to the reader since the content is in context. Pichpich (talk) 19:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pichpich: The article must be separate because there is a background of the square that is serving as forerunner of the topic. There are also a lot of disputes in the square by major religious denominations recently, and can be expanded through news sources. The Supermind (talk) 13:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it can be expanded but there's still no reason to have it as a separate article. Note also that the "Purpose" section is not really tied to the status of Meskel Square. There's plenty of room to merge into a more solid single article. Pichpich (talk) 16:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]