Talk:Methods of passing as male
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 October 2018. The result of the discussion was merge. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Methods of passing as male. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091223034703/http://saints-archive.com:80/ to http://www.saints-archive.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Guide
[edit]Does Wikipedia start to use as a guide? הראש (talk) 21:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion
[edit]Ethanpet113, you might as well take the article to WP:AfD or propose that some aspects of the article be merged into the Passing (gender) article. As for improving the article, it doesn't need "rephrasing it to reflect academic studies on the matter." We shouldn't be going by single studies. The content should be supported by WP:Secondary and tertiary sources. As for WP:NOTHOWTO, some of the material needs to be reworded to avoid "how to" information, but WP:NOTHOWTO is clear that "describing to the reader how people or things use or do something is encyclopedic; instructing the reader in the imperative mood about how to use or do something is not." If you reply to me on this, I prefer not to be pinged since this article is on my watchlist. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)