Jump to content

Talk:Michael Beinhorn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Picture

[edit]

This article needs a picture of him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.41.229.217 (talkcontribs) 19:52, 16 February 2007

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Beinhorn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly written; bias language

[edit]

Someone needs to change the tone of this article. First of all it’s clearly written by a white male considering the music they use adjectives like “legendary” and “iconic” to describe, like white name artists such as nine inch nails and sound garden, and of course discriminating against any artist that isn’t white male like Hole, Grand Master Flash, etc.

Encyclopedias are supposed to be dry and scientific-like. An album that was made 30 years ago like “downward spiral” you have no way of knowing if it will be legendary or fade out of favor and sounding dated. Why isn’t Hole’s “celebrity skin” legendary? It sold approximately as much as nine inch nails. Oh yeah, because most white males have foaming at the mouth hatred and venom for Courtney Love for no other reason than their ignorance misogyny and sexism.

It needs to be objective, not sound like a fanboy writing about his favorite albums. It’s also especially painful when you can predict favor/disfavor based on race and sex. 2600:1012:B11B:98AF:C1B5:808A:6E3F:D1D (talk) 18:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm mmm 2600:6C54:4500:7DFC:88DF:3F32:FCD4:590B (talk) 05:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]