Jump to content

Talk:Michael I of Wallachia/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 05:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lead and infobox; all good
  • Section 1; all good
  • Section 2; all good
  • Section 3; better to keep the family tree in an expanded mode
  • The image needs some parameters to be fixed.
  • 13.8% confidence, violation unlikely.
Very well written, flawless. Sorry for the delay. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga:, thank you for your review and suggestions. I hope I fixed all parameters of the image. Sorry, I am not a native English speaker and I do not understand your remark about the family tree. Borsoka (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't matter much. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 23:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 23:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]