Talk:Mike Wallace Is Here
Appearance
Mike Wallace Is Here has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 2, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mike Wallace Is Here article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Mike Wallace Is Here appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 October 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mike Wallace Is Here/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 02:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Opening review Kingsif (talk) 02:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Cast list could be put into columns
- Accolades could have some prose
- Since Release section is two lines, it could be combined with the Reception (to make Release & reception, e.g.)
- Copyvio check only brings up quotes - looks fine
- Sources look fine
- could wikilink archive footage
- Synopsis could be clearer. The main idea of what the film contains is in the production section, and I'm still not quite sure.
- It's got little coverage for what seems to be a very notable documentary - is there nothing more that can be added?
- On hold - worried about lack of coverage and that it doesn't really say what the film is about. Kingsif (talk) 02:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Kingsif, All done. The film is a very notable documentary however every interview talks about the same thing including, 1,400 hours of archival footage, Wallace 60 Minutes, etc. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- @CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Having a table inside a collapse box is not common and is pretty unsightly because it doesn't fit well inside the box - I undid that. Re. coverage - is there really nothing more on the production? Re. synopsis - is there an order of how things happen, what is meant by 'troubled personal life'? Remember per MOSPLOT, it doesn't need to be things cited, as the film is a reference for itself. If you've seen it, write what it shows. Now I know there's a few old interviews and something else, but not what that is. Kingsif (talk) 21:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Kingsif, It should be clear now. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Tweaked it a bit (no need to wikilink 'television program'), but it's clear. Following that there is no more production coverage, passes. Kingsif (talk) 15:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Kingsif, It should be clear now. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- @CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Having a table inside a collapse box is not common and is pretty unsightly because it doesn't fit well inside the box - I undid that. Re. coverage - is there really nothing more on the production? Re. synopsis - is there an order of how things happen, what is meant by 'troubled personal life'? Remember per MOSPLOT, it doesn't need to be things cited, as the film is a reference for itself. If you've seen it, write what it shows. Now I know there's a few old interviews and something else, but not what that is. Kingsif (talk) 21:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class Documentary films articles
- Documentary films task force articles
- GA-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors