Jump to content

Talk:Minnesota State Highway 33

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomenclature

[edit]

At the risk of setting off another edit war (which I sincerely am trying to avoid), I have revised this page. I hope this compromise works. We are not writing an AASHTO tome here; we are providing an encylopedia for everyone. Kablammo 00:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And if we really want to get technical, the road is formally Legislative Route 164. (The numbering system for Minnesota Constitutional and Legislative Routes is different from the numbers by which they are publicly known.) Kablammo 00:26, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see my attempt was unsuccessful. Interestingly, even the official Minnesota State Highway Map put out by MnDOT does not use the "Trunk Highway" or "TH" terminology in its map key.[1] As far as the public is concerned, this is a "State Highway." Kablammo 15:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its a road... who cares! This is an encyclopedia and not an atlas. (My take, almost all of these road articles should be deleted and being a violation of WP:NOT) Blueboar 16:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More discussion of this unfortunate dispute is on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Minnesota State Highways. Kablammo 01:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For crying out loud...

[edit]

We've had 41 edits on this article. Nearly 25% is reverts? Okay we have move warring, massive vandalism tagging, edit warring, and whatnot going on here? And editors being scared away from projects and from Wiki for good? How is this not disruption? By all parties here. I'm submitting this to protection. All of you ought to be ashamed. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes and vandalism. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I know I am. Just apply a block as long as you think is appropriate. I'll be back in town on Saturday, the 5th, so my block will have to continue into next week for it to be effective. (I'm editing via borrowed wireless access and/or a dialup connection while I'm on vacation.)
I should have never created this article in the first place -- under any title. Elkman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 01:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, even vandalism gets like 4 warnings. I don't think it's blockable, but if an admin disagrees with me, I'll stand corrected.
Yeah a lot of us feel that way too. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:51, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minnesota State Highway 33. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Minnesota State Highway 33. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]