Talk:Mirzayi
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mirzayi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090616090224/http://enciklopedia.jino-net.ru/1/154.html to http://enciklopedia.jino-net.ru/1/154.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Recent edit
[edit]Hi Interfase. Could you please specify which source you refer to is the "reliable" one, and which of them are exactly independent that you felt the need to revert me? I'm afraid I don't find your revert reason sufficient. Regards, ZaniGiovanni (talk) 10:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- All sources that I returned to the article are reliable as there are encyclopedic articles about this dance and about the dance art in Azerbaijan and they note that it is Azerbaijani dance as well. The information about Armenian dance is also based on Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia. And yes, they are independent sources because they are not closely affiliated with the subject. The authors of these articles are not the authors of the music of this dance. --Interfase (talk) 10:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
And yes, they are independent sources because they are not closely affiliated with the subject.
– That's not what independent means actually, it usually is the opposite because of close affiliation. I'm sorry, but you didn't address my concerns: which of the sources you returned are WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:RS, please be specific. Regards, ZaniGiovanni (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)- I think that you did not clearly understand what WP:INDEPENDENT means. Actually I clearly address your concern. --Interfase (talk) 20:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- By the way, here you added the same source (Краткий словарь танцев) claiming that Uzundara is Armenian dance as well. But in this article you want to remove the same source. So, when the source claims that the dance is Armenian it is reliable and independent for you, and when it is claiming that the dance is Azerbaijani it is not reliable and not independent, is it? --Interfase (talk) 20:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- To be honest, I didn't notice that source in this article, no need to make your personal guesses and try to assume WP:GF which I already told you. I think it qualifies as an independent source, I'll take a closer look at it in both here and Uzundara page. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 07:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)