Talk:Moodu Pani
![]() | Moodu Pani has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 28, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from Moodu Pani appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 October 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Moodu Pani/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: West Virginian (talk · contribs) 13:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Kailash29792, I will be engaging in a thorough and comprehensive review of this article by the end of this week. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime. Thanks! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Kailash29792 and Ssven2, I've finally completed a thorough and comprehensive review of this article, and I assess that it meets the criteria for Good Article status. Prior to its passage, however, I do have a few suggestions and comments that should be addressed. Thank you for all your research and hard work on this article! I apologize for the delay. -- West Virginian (talk) 13:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Lede
- Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, the lede of this article adequately defines the film, establishes the film's necessary context, and explains why the film is otherwise notable.
- The info box is beautifully formatted and its content is sourced within the prose of the text and by the referenced cited therein.
- The image of the movie poster in the info box has the necessary templates attached declaring that it is "Non-free media data" and gives the "Non-free media rationale for Moodu Pani."
- The lede is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.
- Note: Due to usages of words like "behavior," "characterisation," and "motorbike," I would suggest adding the "Indian English" template to the article's talk page.
Pilot
- I wonder if the first sentence would flow better if it was re-rendered as "has held a hated for prostitutes since childhood" or "has had a hated for prostitutes since childhood"
- This section is otherwise well-written and I have no other comments or questions for this section. No sources are necessary per WP:FILMPLOT.
Cast
- While formatted properly, are there any inline citations for this section?
- The cast members have been sourced in the production section. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Production
- While not necessary, it wouldn't hurt to include an image of Balu Mahendra in this section.
- Bangalore can be de-linked here as it is linked above in the prose.
- This section is otherwise well-written, properly sourced with verifiable references and inline citations, and I have no other suggestions or comments regarding this section.
Themes
- I would suggest rendering the fifth sentence as such: According to Sify, there is a strong similarity between Moodu Pani and Psycho as the male leads in both films keep the skeletal remains of their respective mothers, which they continue to communicate with.
- This section is otherwise well-written, properly sourced with verifiable references and inline citations, and I have no other suggestions or comments regarding this section.
- Does this line need any improvement? "Ilangovan noted that the characterisation of Chandru, with flashes of wickedness bordering on perversion, was new to Tamil cinema because the viewers ultimately could not hate him". Please do some proofreading, and suggest a better rewording if necessary. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Kailash29792:
Done I've tweaked the sentence. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Kailash29792: and @Ssven2: the reworked sentence looks good to go. -- West Virginian (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Kailash29792:
- Does this line need any improvement? "Ilangovan noted that the characterisation of Chandru, with flashes of wickedness bordering on perversion, was new to Tamil cinema because the viewers ultimately could not hate him". Please do some proofreading, and suggest a better rewording if necessary. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Music
- The info box is beautifully formatted and the image used has the necessary fair use rationale templates.
- The track list is also beautifully formatted and sourced.
- This section is well-written, properly sourced with verifiable references and inline citations, and I have no suggestions or comments regarding this section.
Reception
- This section is well-written, properly sourced with verifiable references and inline citations, and I have no suggestions or comments regarding this section.
- Thanks. But some of the reviews are modern day ones. They still good here? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Legacy
- This section is well-written, properly sourced with verifiable references and inline citations, and I have no suggestions or comments regarding this section.
- @West Virginian: Many thanks for the review, West Virginian. Your comments have been resolved. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:31, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Kailash29792: and @Ssven2: Thank you both tremendously for your hard work on this article, and for your patience with me throughout this process. It is hereby a pleasure for me to pass this article to Good Article status! Thank you and congratulations on a job well done! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- @West Virginian: Thanks again, West Virginian.
— Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:53, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- @West Virginian: Thanks again, West Virginian.
- @Kailash29792: and @Ssven2: Thank you both tremendously for your hard work on this article, and for your patience with me throughout this process. It is hereby a pleasure for me to pass this article to Good Article status! Thank you and congratulations on a job well done! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Congrats. There you go, you didn't need me after all...♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Wikipedia articles that use Indian English
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class Indian cinema articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- GA-Class India articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Tamil Nadu articles
- Low-importance Tamil Nadu articles
- GA-Class Tamil Nadu articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Tamil Nadu articles
- Low-importance Indian cinema articles
- GA-Class Indian cinema articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles