Talk:Moser Baer
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article sounds like propaganda material.
[edit]Most of the material in this article seems to be copied off of the company website and hence, reads like an ad. This needs to be heavily rewritten, with less subjective remarks and more cited information and facts.164.107.170.136 (talk) 20:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree with that. This sounds like an advertisement and has no citations. It says that its India's first and world's 2nd. Is there any proof. Looks like it was written by the company itself. 59.93.10.21 (talk) 03:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
True, I agree to this too. This page sounds like it's probably written by some Moser Baer marketing staff. Products made by this company are of average quality and prone to failures with poor warranty/replacement network. Someone should highlight these facts. 113.21.77.135 (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Moser baer logo2.jpg
[edit]Image:Moser baer logo2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Moser Baer/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Can somebody tell me why the site is marked as Malware by Google? [[User:Shirishag75|Shirishag75]] 15:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 15:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)