Talk:Mount Taylor (New Mexico)

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico.

Pre-eruption height

The following speculative and highly implausible material has been removed from the article:

Estimates vary about how high the mountain was before the eruption, common estimates are between 12,000 and 17,000 feet, although more recent estimates estimate that it could have been much higher, between 15,000 and 22,000 feet^{[citation needed]}.

If anyone can find reliable sources (e.g. a USGS report, or a paper published in a reputable geological journal), it can go back in. --Seattle Skier (talk) 22:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Sunoco 03:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Sorry. I know a guy who said that at the ABQ museum , although I was able to find info on it. Info is here.[reply]

Says here it may have been as high 25,000 feet.

Unfortunately Summitpost doesn't count as a reliable source for this kind of information, especially when it is uncited on the Summitpost page. Also, see below for other criticism of this passage. -- Spireguy 02:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

El Malpais and crater development

The statement below is fundamentally incorrect:

"It is part of the same volcanic system as the nearby El Malpais. When Mount Taylor erupted, it cut off a large chunk of the mountain's summit, and estimates vary about how high the mountain was before the eruption."

Mt. Taylor, being one to three million years older than the El Malpais system is in no way part of it. It is two completely different volcanic episodes that happened to occur relatively close by. In this case, I think the burden of citation should be on the claim that thay are of the same system when clearly, they are not.

The eruptions occurred over thousands of years. A single eruption did not cut off a chunk of the summit. Recent studies conducted by the University of New Mexico Geology Department have concluded that the event that shaped the mountain was not explosive, but implosive. The lava reservoir in the mountain flowed out leaving a cavity which eventually collapsed. Brainyak 21:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Brainyak[reply]

Thanks to Brainyak for the input, and yes, the burden should be on the person including the info, so we should probably remove the current passage. But as you seem to be more in the know on this, can you please write a better passage, with citation(s)? -- Spireguy 02:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading Image

The image Mount Taylor crater 2011.JPG does not adequately convey any context. You would think there is nothing left of the mountain but a few rocks and a plant looking at it. It should be removed or at least given a better caption. Jstuby (talk) 02:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image removed Jstuby (talk) 02:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mount Taylor (New Mexico). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081210093531/http://volcano.oregonstate.edu/vwdocs/volc_images/north_america/new_mexico/taylor.html to http://volcano.oregonstate.edu/vwdocs/volc_images/north_america/new_mexico/taylor.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]