Jump to content

Talk:My Neighbour Totoro (play)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk22:04, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Sdrqaz (talk). Self-nominated at 22:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: only ALT2 is clear and interesting as is, others are perhaps too cryptic (e.g what does the colloquialism "sore cheeks" mean? "human field of corn" and "new wind spirits", need explanation ...) created in September, expanded recently, but c. 3-fold past 7 days, and 5-fold in c. 30 days which is more than the required 7.Unfortunately fails on the newness criteria, (as far as I can tell). -Bogger (talk) 18:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bogger: I used DYKcheck to check and it's telling me that 5x expansion began on November 13, which is within seven days of November 19. Maybe one or the other check is inaccurate here? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:41, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdrqaz: ok I had compared the raw files, but comparison should have been done on the prose. My bad. -Bogger (talk) 14:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The hooks still need attention. Even with ALT2, maybe new plays often work without a script in early stages (Workshop production), so it's not interesting enough? something like...
ALT5:... that Totoro's production team makes extensive use of puppets, so that audience will want to "fall asleep on his belly"? https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/theatre/my-neighbour-totoro-barbican-royal-shakespeare-company-b1032199.html (AGF)-Bogger (talk) 14:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can't say I agree on the hooks. The point of a hook at DYK is to draw the reader in to want to read the article. The "cryptic" nature of ALTs 0, 3, and 4 are not bugs, they're features. ALT0's "sore cheeks" is not a colloquialism: if cheeks are sore, they hurt ... Sdrqaz (talk) 17:11, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Approved, (recommending ALT1) -Bogger (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Sdrqaz (talk) 06:04, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
While I understand the sentiment behind that, it's more of a case-by-case thing rather than being actively encouraged. Sometimes hooks are just too cryptic that they actually hurt readership rather than help, and I can see those cases being examples of that. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps – DYK hookiness is a little unpredictable. I personally prefer ALT0 and the other "quirky" ones because they feel a lot more interesting (how does it give you sore cheeks?), but it's up to the promoter. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:04, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]