Talk:Nandivarman II

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

India: Tamil Nadu / History Stub‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Weak references

The references at the moment are:

   * recently found inscriptions by ASI
   * Bahur, kasakudi, udieyendiram and tadantottam plates of Nandi varman
   * Hymns of alwar saints

Better references are needed. Salilb (talk) 12:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uses peacock terms to describe the person of interest.

The article uses many peacock terms to describe the historical figure in question. Also the references are not verifiable. "recently found inscriptions by ASI" cannot be listed as a source. It does not have a link. Unclear information, the term "Previous mentioned enemy" is used multiple times, yet no specific information is provided on the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.119.207.66 (talk) 07:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why the foreign tour by officials?

It is hard to believe that the ministers and officials could not find someone in the kingdom. I mean could they not find one, just one legitimate heir locally to ascend the throne? Looks like they had to find a reason to go on vacation to Bali, Thailand and other hot spots. On a more serious note, apart from traditional accounts, are there any epigraphs that record that the sovereign was born abroad? Nittawinoda (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]