Talk:National Palace of Culture

Bulgaria Mid‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Just rumours

According to urban legends, NDK was built using much more concrete than necessary, and its base can survive bombing. The underground part is very large, and its original purpose is unclear. It would be interesting to find a source. --Cameltrader 07:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on National Palace of Culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051027154759/http://aipc.org:80/en/wnewart/july_2005.doc to http://www.aipc.org/en/wnewart/july_2005.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unverified content

This article is almost entirely lacking verification. Also much of the content reads like an advertising/PR resumé, going even further in this than the content of the subject's official website. Please take note that, after a respectful interval, I intend to return and remove a large quantity of unencyclopedic and unverified content. Bjenks (talk) 04:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity awards

One of the awards listed is by the Europe Business Assembly which has been identified as a vanity award, that is, bought and paid for by the National Palace. These awards are scams and is a strong signal that other awards listed may also be fraudulent in nature. -- GreenC 15:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]