Talk:New Sarawak Tribune
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the New Sarawak Tribune article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The New Sarawak Tribune section removed: possible COI
[edit]Removed the section below, as the language suggested that it was contributed by an editor with a conflict of interest (specifically, the phrase "an error of judgment on our part", and it injected POV (the final paragraph). Notified the contributor. The substance of the edit - that the paper has been reborn with a new name - is a useful addition but needs verification.
'The New Sarawak Tribune
On 19 May 2010, the New Sarawak Tribune returned to the newsstand after a four-year hiatus. Tribune Press Sdn Bhd chairman Datuk Hamed Sepawi said during its shutdown, the management "took time to reflect and reinvigorate ourselves".
The prefix “The New” signifies a fresh beginning and replaces Eastern Times (as it did the old Tribune), which had its purpose in life, born as it were from a blot in the paper’s history. There’s no running away from the fact that the old Tribune was suspended in 2006 as a result of an error of judgment on our part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zahzuhzaz (talk • contribs) 18:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)