Talk:Nihilism (Alexander McQueen collection)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 19:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 18:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dibs on this one too actually. I think I can knock the initial review on both of these out this weekend so you can get started upon your return. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion #1: Well written

Lede is high quality, don't see any problems here.
Background section also good.
Again, despite his hesitation, his friends persuaded him might be clearer as Despite his hesitation, his friends again persuaded him
Rest of Concept and collection and Runway show seems good.
Reception quite well written.
Since McQueen is British and this uses British English, we should probably avoid false titles like "British fashion designer Alexander McQueen" or "Fashion theorist Caroline Evans" in lieu of " The fashion theorist Caroline Evans" and "The British fashion designer Alexander McQueen".

Criterion #2: Well-sourced

Sourcing looks good and consistent, SFNs correctly formatted. I'm a bit confused why Mora & Berry 2022 and Arnold 1999 aren't using SFNs though; you only have one cite for Homer (albeit used many times).

Spot check shall follow...