Talk:Norsk Spisevognselskap/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Instead, it partly constructed a tourist hotel in the station building at Oppdal Station... needs a mention of the partner in this development, as otherwise the sentence is inconclusive. Not done
I don't think I get what you mean, the operation was carried out by NSS through the Ministry of Transport and Communications. --Eisfbnore ^talk 14:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As of 2011, the state railways handles the catering service on trains by procurement. Do you mean tendered contracts? Done

The lead doesn't summarise the last section fully. Not done

I made a number of copy-edits.[1]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Referencing is good, sources appear RS, no evidence of OR. Assume good faith for off-line sources and those on-line in Norwegian.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
What happened to ReitanNarvesen? Who did it sell the rights to? ~~As noted on the talk page, a little more about the company executives would be good, if it can be found.~~ Not done
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Gimme ten minutes, please? --Eisfbnore ^talk 18:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)~~[reply]
Oh, sorry, I'm in another time zone so I actually have two hours left to go! --Eisfbnore ^talk 18:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok hold extended until 20 April, will that do? Jezhotwells (talk) 21:07, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There still remain un-addressed points, so I shall not be listing this article. Please work on these points and then re-nominate. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I have solved all these isssues by now. --Eisfbnore ^talk 10:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]