Talk:Numismatics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Numismatics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 91 days

Numismatics Top‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Odd and Curious

There is no citation to support the idea that early currencies are thought "odd and curious," and if this is a term of art there is no context given. Explain? Tranquilled (talk) 20:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also found this phrase very peculiar, especially in the first explanatory paragraph. wiktionary says the phrase is "(idiomatic, US) A way to designate special coins, namely coins that are both odd and imperfect or seriously damaged." so it doesn't seem to apply specifically to early currencies. The usage I see by coin collectors includes a lot of modern stuff used in extreme circumstances. e.g. http://www.joelscoins.com/odd.htm Danny Rathjens (talk) 20:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Numismatics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628134602/http://emuseum.treasury.go.th/th/home/ to http://emuseum.treasury.go.th/th/home/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The example of one of Alexander the Great's coin

I'm not sure one specific example like this adds to the article and follows encyclopedic style, but I also feel hesitant to delete this person's edit. If it is kept, perhaps it needs an introductory sentence explaining that (for example) numismatists may analyse symbolic and cultural elements of coin design and relate these to an historical understanding of the location and era of a coin's creation / use? It also seems to be placed in a strange spot, under the Modern Numismatics and Subfieds sections, though it does not relate to either of these and might sit better higher up in the article. Hope this helps! Crinoline (talk) 16:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1952 D penny the t is missing in trust

1952D penny in the word trust the t is missing 2600:1700:E0D0:6820:7CFF:CA02:7FED:84A3 (talk) 05:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Манета

монета царской России 1910г. Нанимал одна 89.40.195.76 (talk) 21:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]