Talk:Ofuda

Japan: Shinto Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 11:14, November 7, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Shinto task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Is there really a type of ofuda with the inscription 悪霊退散 Akuryo Taisan (Evil spirit, begone)?--Ki no Senshi (talk) 03:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese Wikipedia. "Onmyōdō" is said to be one of the origin.

60.33.36.249 (talk) 19:12, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why title is "Ofuda" and not "O-fuda"?

Why title is "Ofuda" and not "O-fuda, as in the text"? --109.53.223.78 (talk) 23:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved per common name. DrKiernan (talk) 16:48, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ofuda → O-fuda – as in the text 109.53.223.78 (talk) 23:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any evidence of what the name should be? Since anyone could edid the article the fact that it uses O-fuda is not in itself proof that it is the correct term since it's possible that the editor who used the term was wrong.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppoese and suggest to use "ofuda" in the text. According to Google ngram viewer, ofuda is more commonly used than o-fuda. Omamori was also changed to use "o-mamori" around the same time and then moved to o-mamori. I undid the unilateral pagemove[1] and changed back to use "ofuda"[2]. --Kusunose

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.