Jump to content

Talk:On-demand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think they have more to provide as information for the information technology in general. On-Demand service refer ready to use. In IT world, having an application that can scale and stay reliable for the end user client is a big challenge. In IT world, On-Demand refer to solution that is highly reliable and easily scalable to grow with the needs of the application so the end user will not notice any service interruption when the infrastructure is upgraded.

I think they would have an interest for an article for On-Demand keyword for wikipedia and I would be interest to write the On-Demand meaning for Information Technology field.

Olivier Contant IT consultant —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.66.71.14 (talk) 23:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Why does this article exist? It needs to go or it needs to be given something to keep it worthwhile. - Kuzain 04:01, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Saas Page

[edit]

This page and the Software as a Service (Saas) page need to be merged into the same article. They are the same things, just different names for it.

on-demand is not something ibm or salesforce offers but much broader trend for all future software use (and what about music, sports etc on demand?). relationship with ASP should be provided

Application Service Provider?

[edit]

How is this different from an Application Service Provider? This on-deman article has almost no substantive content; the ASP article is fairly complete. Why not just delete this article entirely?

Agree, I've split and merged this article with Application service provider and Utility computing, where appropriate. This page now just redirects to a disambiguation page. -- Bovineone

Foxtel

[edit]

What about the shameless plug for Foxtel. This is disguised advertisement if you ask me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Crackettt (talkcontribs) 08:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Agreed. I've removed the link to it. -- Bovineone 08:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]