Talk:Open-access monograph

Open-access monograph is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Open Access to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Creative Commons licensing (to replace Creative Commons license); Creative Commons Attribution License (currently a redirect), reproducible research (currently a redirect), supplementary material. Scholarly Open Access (currently a redirect)
Cleanup : Access2Research
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stub-Class Open access articles.
Other : add {{WikiProject Open Access}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess;
- Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally.

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

No independent notability

@Lawsonstu: as far as I can see, an "open access monograph" is just the same thing as a monograph that happens to have been published OA. I don't see anything special or particular about this subject (which is, of course, why I redirected it to an appropriate target). --Randykitty (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By that logic, open access journal should also not have it's own page? - Lawsonstu (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a research topic in it's own right (e.g. [1] and there is a directory [2], same as for journals. - Lawsonstu (talk) 15:32, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's an abundant literature on OA journals. I dare say that is not the case for OA monographs. --Randykitty (talk) 15:44, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you're challenging notability you should tag it so instead of redirecting without discussion. fgnievinski (talk) 18:19, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting something instead of tagging is quite a regular action and doesn't need discussion in advance. If it's challenged (like any other ordinary edit), you take it to the talk page. Please familiarize yourself with WP:BOLD. --Randykitty (talk) 18:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It did seem fairly sourced, so claiming "no independent notability" because it receives less coverage than OA journals is a bit of a stretch IMO. Also, as noted in the article, OA books are unique at least in their business models. fgnievinski (talk) 18:57, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of open access projects which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of open-access projects which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"DOAB" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DOAB. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]