Talk:Operation Bertram/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sven Manguard (talk · contribs) 02:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
GAN Quicksheet 1.23 SM
(Criteria)
Starting comments: Looks interesting.
1. Well written: Section acceptable
- a. prose/copyright: I moved a section around, because it felt out of place where it was. Other than that, it was fine.
Acceptable
- b. MoS compliance:
Acceptable
2. Accurate and verifiable: Section acceptable
- a. provides references: Obviously I'm assuming good faith on the printed materials. Dazzled and Deceived: Mimicry and Camouflage sounds like a fascinating read (just from the title) but I don't have any of the books.
Acceptable
- b. proper citation use:
Acceptable
- c. no original research:
Acceptable
3. Broad in coverage: Section acceptable
6. Image use: Section acceptable
- a. license/tagging correct: Always nice to see properly done FURs. Saves me the time of fixing them.
- b. relevant/properly captioned:
7. Additional items not required for a GA, but requested by the reviewer:
- a.
images that should have alt texts have them:Done.Needs work Please consider doing this, as it does have a big impact on accessibility.
- b. general catch all and aesthetics: Meh. I don't really love the image placement, some things butt into sections they shouldn't, but it's nothing major.
Comments after the initial review: Was interesting. Little piece of history I never knew about. Solid piece of work, I'm happy to promote this. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)