Jump to content

Talk:Oque d'El Rey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move as of yet. The proposed name will be created as a redirect; in the event that someone creates and article on the town (or another ambiguously titled article), this article can be moved. Additionally, it can be moved to the "d'el Rei" spelling if that turns out to be the better spelling.--Cúchullain t/c 19:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Oque d'El ReyDesportivo de Oque d'El Rei – This is the correct name of the club. --Relisted. Andrewa (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC) --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 17:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Fayçal.09 (talk) 21:04, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. I don't think we should spend any more time on this. No evidence at all has been offered that the correct name is as proposed in terms of WP:AT, and presumably the user who moved it here thought it wasn't, the log reads 23:31, 24 February 2014‎ Lglukgl (talk | contribs | block)‎ . . (43 bytes) (+43)‎ . . (Lglukgl moved page Desportivo de Oque d'El Rei to Oque d'El Rey). It might have been good to ask User:Lglukgl their reasons for this previous bold move, they are still very active in editing football articles, but there's a redirect in place, it's no big issue. On the other hand the article badly needs work in other ways, see above and below. Andrewa (talk) 02:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]

Please note that the official name of the club has little bearing on the article title, in terms of WP:AT (the policy to which many, many notices point... please don't ignore them, and do read the policy, and the essay at WP:official name should help explain how it applies to such cases). Andrewa (talk) 20:11, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.