Talk:Orfordness transmitting station

Radio: UK Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

How tall are the towers? When were they built?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Orfordness transmitting station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.rnw.nl/medianetwork/dutch-radio-1-to-start-using-648-khz-on-4-august

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:18, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frequencies

I'm guessing it's no coincidence that of the frequencies chosen, one was exactly double the other. I presume this would have simplified the antenna arrangements, but it would be mice to have confirmation by somebody who knows what they're talking about. Lee M (talk) 01:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a coincidence. It made no difference to the antenna arrangements. Harumphy (talk) 22:36, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was very deliberate, no coincidence. It doesn't affect the antennae so much as the transmitter.

There was an operational need for transmitters on two frequencies, one approximately twice the other. If two large transmitters share a site and are closely spaced in frequency, there are all manner of interference problems. This is still the case when one frequency is close to a harmonic of the other. The easiest way to avoid this is to make the frequencies an exact multiple of each other, by running them all from the same master oscillator.

The antennae at Orfordness were separate though. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many AM broadcast sites run multiple transmitters (e.g. Droitwich 198, 693, 1089 and 1215 kHz), often with the output of two or more transmitters fed through a combining unit to a shared antenna. It's commonplace. The combining unit provides the necessary isolation between transmitters. At Orfordness, the wide separation between the two arrays provided isolation. If any more had been required, simple filters could have done the job. The reason that Orfordness used 648 and 1296 is that these were two of the high-power allotments to the UK following GE75. The rest (693, 810, 882, 909, 1053, 1089, 1152, 1215, 1458 IIRR) were used for domestic networks. It may have been that there was an operational need for frequencies at Orfordness at *approximately* these frequencies because of their propagation characteristics, but there was no need for an exact 2:1 ratio. That was a coincidence arising from the limited choice available from the GE75 allotment. Harumphy (talk) 12:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Caroline

Radio Caroline has commenced it's regular transmissions on 648 kHz, so the station is no longer out of service. The article should be revised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derasselner (talk • contribs) 10:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looked to me that the content was not incorrect but the headings were outdated so I changed them. Hope this is suitable Jiver2 (talk) 09:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]