Jump to content

Talk:Oscar Ukonu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

?

[edit]

@Tcr25, why did you change the date of the [1] ref? Maggie Cai and Dylan Brzezinski Jan 1, 2021, 1:22 AM is what it says, at least to me. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:08, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: I wonder if the website is adjusting the time/date locally based on the reader's time zone. It says 31 Dec. 2020 7:22 PM for me, which matches with the "2020-12" in the URL ... Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 15:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that may be it. Doesn't matter. Trevlig helg! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tack så mycket! Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exhibitions

[edit]

@Vexations, hope you are well. About the Exhibitions section in the article, is it ok-ish or does it fail per the primary sources/galleries without WP-articles? Independent RS would obviously be better. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no firm consensus on this, as far as I can tell. Some folks seem to find these lists of exhibitions helpful. I don't, unless we have a reliable, independent source and have taken place somewhere significant, like a museum or a public gallery or a very significant commercial gallery. I generally consider musueim reliable, even if, strictly speaking, they're not independent; but if MoMA has a listing of an exhibition, I'd use that.
That doesn't appear to be the case here. Any source that starts with "... is pleased to present " is a press release. These exhibitions are a) not in notable venues, and b) have not received any critical attention (I mean that a qualified professional has written about them, not that the review was negative). Vexations (talk) 19:53, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Like with including a book in a bio, some independent RS should have noted it exists. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:51, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]