Jump to content

Talk:Outline of thought

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to

[edit]

See the proposal at the Village pump

The Transhumanist 09:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines for outlines

[edit]

Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.

Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.

The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "History of" section needs links!

[edit]

Please add some relevant links to the history section.

Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates. Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.

The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines

[edit]

"Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation. The Transhumanist 00:11, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How do we know the chimpanzee is thinking?

[edit]

Maybe it just looks like it's thinking. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 06:22, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The chimpanzee shows metacognition which is a sufficient criterion for cognition and therefore thinking in general. 84.119.3.225 (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't emotion influence thinking?

[edit]

Because if I'm angry I think different thoughts than when I'm calm. Shouldn't we therefore add Emotion to Aspects of the thinker? 84.119.3.225 (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]