Talk:Park Avenue Houses

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge discussion

The four properties that comprise this NRHP listing, Henry P. Davison House, Oliver D. Filley House, Percy R. Pyne House, and William Sloane House, are all stub articles as is this one. I propose that the individual articles be merged here and redirect here until enough content exists for any of these properties to stand alone as at least a C-class quality article. Fortguy (talk) 07:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. Gryffindor (talk) 21:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? The info within the 4 articles incorporated within the merged article would still not suffice to create a C-class article. If Park Avenue Houses were a decent article, then I could see branching out into the individual 4 properties provided they were not stubs. The 4 location articles are the only ones of the tens of thousands on WP:NRHP that aren't even developed enough to have a proper infobox. Fortguy (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the merge as well. They protected the four houses under a single NRHP "Park Avenue Houses" but they all have a different history/architects/style/etc. The article Percy R. Pyne House is significantly developed too. I don't think we get any quality improvement by merging. --Deansfa (talk) 23:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]