Talk:Pastoral Provision

Christianity: Catholicism / Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Traditional Anglican Communion

I rewrote the section on the TAC and added a link to the Wikipedia page on them and in particular the section on the discussions with the Vatican. I think that this is the best way to handle this section. Anyone interested can go to the TAC page, which will probably be updated more frequently, accurately, and comprehensively. --Bruce Hall (talk) 06:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Faculty?

Would someone explain the list of "faculty"? The article contains a list of names and academic fields, but with no explanation of what they do in relation to the pastoral provision. Chonak (talk) 04:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should the redirect to Anglican Use be reverted?

Should the redirect to Anglican Use be reverted? See discussion on Talk:Anglican Use--Bruce Hall (talk) 07:04, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a discussion on Talk:Anglican Use I have reverted the redirect and have tagged this article with Template:Primary Sources. After enough time has elapsed for some editing, then there will be a discussion about merging this with Anglican Use, or maybe with Clerical celibacy (Catholic Church). See and participate in the full discussion at Talk:Anglican Use. --Bruce Hall (talk) 05:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pastoral Provision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]